The four elemental factors chosen for Project Risk Ratings are: • Feedstock reliability • Carbon incentive security • Market forces adaptability • Economic resilience The four elements were chosen because they all display a combination of significance, according to proprietary surveys conducted with Digest readers, and they are readily available or easily identifiable for most bioeconomy projects that have been announced. The objective of Project Risk Ratings is to provide a fast, triage-level risk rating to accelerate stakeholder engagement, as requested by the 40 Bold Actions to Accelerate the Bioeconomy, drafted by the Bold Goals Action Group in 2024. Feedstock reliability is based on the feedstock type, using feedstock risk ratings which may be developed by Ecostrat. PRECISION ratings use actual project specific feedstock risk ratings. Carbon incentive security is based on the Carbon Intensity as posted by the California Air Resource Board LCFS Pathway Certified Carbon Intensity values. PRECISION ratings use actual project specific life cycle analysis which may be provided by Boundless Impact Research & Analytics. Market forces adaptability is measured in the Digest’s SuperData, an analysis of 300 projects developed no later than 2014 and their outcome as of 2024. 90 percent of projects that were non-successful or otherwise non-operational 10 years after announcement have closed for non-technical reasons. Economic resilience measures the sensitivity to changes in the assumptions of base-case Return on Investment models, or project specific ROI analysis supplied by projects under NDA. |